So, is it what you expected? I for myself liked the singleplayer (played it on XBOX 360), but I don't feel the same way with multiplayer, I mean that I don't hate to play it, but it just seems somehow...too "fun". Theres not an actual feeling of war. I prefer CoD 4 because it just is what I want it to be. I think this is personal opinion but feel free to hate me for it

it was different from MW1 which i liked (the part where you use both left and right clicks rather than just the standard left clicking) and the vehicle parts.

also for multi-player i liked the fact you could "save" your kill streaks for later unlike MW1.

only problem for PC is that there isnt dedicated servers and you get really shit people playing on wireless or really shitty connection and computer.

i pub it for fun. scrimmed it a few times...as long as people abide by the rulesets its all good

I didn't really like cod since cod2 it turned into an even more of a spawn and die game, I prefer coop story games, prefer bc2 to mw2 though

Same here soulurus just feel theres alot more to do than spray and lag.

I only played it a bit when it first came out; but once I realized there wouldn't be much competition in it due to the lack of dedicated servers I stopped playing. It was definitely an interesting game though with a lot of unique features and it was cool to just load up the game, join a party with your friends, and be able to play together.

I was playing in russia the other day with good ping................

well he's been mocked on thetz and now cybergamer...has anyone quoted this on tek-9...

MW2 was a good game. I enjoyed pubbing it for the first 2 weeks. I played TWL and it was fun with people abiding by the rulesets such as no auto shotguns and launchers. but just the lack of dedicated servers and no record killed the game.

Played multi-player pubs, while waiting for it to go competitive. Never really did that so i sold the game haha =)

I do believe the game has competitive potential, but only with significant modding like CoD4 had. I wish Treyarch or Activison would make a CoD that was designed for competitive play :/.

100% agree with you

BAD game is really bad

I really don't understand how you can say that when its built off the CoD4 engine...the only difference really is skins and maps and of course a few extra guns. Where I think that MW2 goes down hill is that the kill streaks are too overpowered and 3 of the 4 deathstreaks (copy cat is an OK one) are ridicules.

CoD 4 is also bad.

But, the difference between them is that, yes kill streaks are OP, but also instead of making a game good for competition that just threw in 100's of different guns and customisable things just to keep pub players happy. They don't give two shits about the 5% of the community who play competitively.

Believe it or not, the reason why this game is so popular at the moment is due to achievement's.

People feel good about themselves if they get an achievement, which causes them to keep playing.

Good games like CSS and HoN encourage skill and less spray and pray. The only achievements that HoN have encourage team work and the better you help your team, the more chance you get of getting these. CoD on the other hand is just achievements for everything possible.